A tech company is developing an alternative to fracking that uses sunlight to produce natural gas. Is it too good to be true??
The full article and background – http://www.hypersolar.com/technology.php
So is there a real alternative to fracking?
– This new technology uses sunlight and nanoparticles to produce natural gas from wastewater.
– The company hopes it will alleviate the need to drill for gas using hydraulic fracturing or fracking.
– In addition to natural gas, the process also purifies wastewater – Mmmm, nice side benefit, hey?
In Australia, the USA and other parts of the globe we are all drilling for natural gas using a controversial process called hydraulic fracturing or fracking, where chemicals and high-pressure water are used to fracture rock, releasing the gas – all very nasty, but lots of money to be made here!
Some environmental activists say the process poses a huge risk to clean drinking water and public health and that the potential for deep underground water contamination used in the shale gas extraction make fracking a huge environmental menace.
Having read and seen this system of extraction – I agree, fracking raises huge environmental issues! But more wells are considered and drilled everyday, with little thought of the legacy being left re the future of our drinking water! http://www.lockthegate.org.au/act_now
Is there is a cleaner way of producing renewable natural gas!
http://www.hypersolar.com/technology.php a tech company in the US says it’s developed a way to make natural gas using sunlight that could clean wastewater and alleviate the need for fracking.
“We have sun and waste in abundance,” said Tim Young, the CEO of HyperSolar Inc., the Santa Barbara-based company that came up with the process. “The more people around the world consume energy and industrialize their lives, the more wastewater there will be for us to make renewable natural gas.”
The process as takes containing millions of nanoparticles. These particles contain semiconductor material and function as self-contained photo electrochemical systems, according to Young. When sunlight hits the particles, an electric charge is generated, driving chemical reactions to form hydrogen at the cathode and oxidizing water at the anode.
From there, the hydrogen is combined with carbon dioxide to form methane, which is the main component of natural gas. The oxidation part of the process cleans the water.
Young said the nanoparticles can be configured to remove certain materials from the water. Applying HyperSolar’s process to hydrogen bromide can produce pure bromide as a byproduct, which can then be marketed for industrial uses.
“Our reactions are designed to occur at normal pressure and temperature,” Young said. “This allows our reactor to be very low-cost and very simple, such as a glass vessel.” The company’s scientific advisers include Eric McFarland, a professor of chemical engineering at the University of California Santa Barbara specializing in energy production processes.
The company envisions scaling up operations by installing rows of inexpensive reactors on vacant, nonproductive land. The resulting carbon-neutral methane could then be piped into the existing infrastructure for natural gas so that homes, power plants, and businesses could use it, Young said.
HyperSolar has applied for a patent on its process, which Young said is still confidential. Currently the company’s nanoparticles still need to be fully developed and tested. They’re also working on bringing down the cost of producing the nanoparticles.
“We have much work to do around protecting the catalysts, finding the ideal semiconductor materials, and working on ways to ensure our costs are competitive with traditional energy sources,” Young said. He expects the technology to be brought to market in three to five years.
Gary Brudvig is a professor of chemistry, molecular biophysics, and biochemistry at Yale University whose research focuses on methods to make solar fuels using natural and artificial photosynthesis.
Gary Brudvig is doubtful that HyperSolar’s process could realistically compete with fracking, why? Because the capacity from wastewater is already pretty limited, he said. “In terms of being able to replace fracking and get us off of fossil fuels use, it certainly won’t have the capacity to do that because it’s all based on biomass.”
But surely Gary it’s a step in the right direction – No???
A way of purifying waste Water?
However, Brudvig found the process’s potential to clean wastewater compelling. “This would be a way of using the biomass energy content as well as purifying the water,” he said. “Wastewater is not going to be useful for anything in the first place, so if they can make something useful out of it, that’s good.”
At Boston College, assistant professor of chemistry Dunwai Wang is researching materials that can be used for solar energy harvesting, conversion and storage. Although the details of HyperSolar’s process haven’t been made public, Wang looked at the company’s general proposal.
“The idea here is that if you can use solar light as the only energy input to produce methane, then it’s considered clean. You don’t generate waste,” he said. Wang added that many research groups are trying to use sunlight for methane production, not just HyperSolar, but they have yet to demonstrate an efficient process to scale.
“If they can actually produce methane specifically with high efficiency and high yield, where solar energy is the only energy input, then that’s really the home run,” he said.
But right now in time it’s a lot easier and more profitable to use Fracking – why look for a better, cleaner technology when you can rape and destroy this planet and people’s lives right now, and then leave a big mess for future generations to clean up???
Research articles – http://www.hypersolar.com/technology.php